Friday, November 4, 2016

Surrogacy ban lacks force of law

Surrogacy ban lacks force of law

A baby born of a surrogate mother sleeps in a hospital. Ishara Kodikara/AFP


Anti-surrogacy advocates have welcomed the government’s recent stance to ban surrogacy in Cambodia, though legal experts have warned that the shady practice could still continue if the prohibition is not enshrined in law.

In a ministry directive, or prakas, signed October 24, Health Minister Mam Bunheng signed off on a total ban on surrogacy. Article 12 of the prakas, obtained by the Post yesterday, reads: “Surrogacy, one of a set of services to have a baby by Assisted Reproductive Technology, is banned completely”.

Bunheng and health spokespeople could not be reached yesterday, but the single line in the prakas did not outline any legal consequences for those who breach the ban.

Legal expert Sok Sam Oeun said this left the ban in a potentially flimsy state. “A prohibition to do something must be made by the law,” he said. A prakas, he added, must be consistent with the law, but there is currently no law outlawing surrogacy.

Justice Ministry spokesman Chin Malin said he was not aware of the Health Ministry’s directive. “We are in the process of studying [so we can start] drafting the law for prevention of surrogacy,” he said.

Rodrigo Montero, gender adviser with the German development agency GIZ, said outlawing surrogacy was the “right approach” because “surrogacy means supporting the selfish interests of foreigners and of those who want to gain money from this very profitable and unethical business”.

But Sam Everingham of Families Through Surrogacy said the Health Ministry’s position was “likely a response to concerted pressure from Western governments” and added that surrogacy arrangements are “poles apart” from child trafficking.

Flooded schools miss first classes in capital

Flooded schools miss first classes in capital

People make their way along a flooded street on the outskirts of Phnom Penh last month after heavy rain caused flooding. Heng Chivoan


Three schools in Phnom Penh’s Dangkor district failed to open for the first day of the school year due to residual flooding from the Prek Thnout River, Ministry of Education spokesman Ros Salin said yesterday.

All schools nationwide were meant to begin classes on November 1.

Salin said that prior to that date, a total of 10 schools in the area were flooded. However, a week before classes were slated to begin, the flooding receded, leaving just three schools – two primary schools and one high school – inundated with water.

The affected schools are Wat Hear Primary School in Prey Sar commune, Spean Thma Primary School in Spean Thma commune and Prek Kompoes Secondary School in Prek Kompoes commune.

“Our officials are working with local authorities to find a way to drain the water from the schools so that students can start their studies next week,” Salin said.

According to Ven Sokun, director of the Dangkor district education office, officials need to build fortified ditches around the schools and set up pumping machines to drain the water. As of yesterday, no such initiative has been taken.

The Prek Thnout flooding last month damaged local dams, destroyed thousands of hectares of rice fields and displaced over 200 families.

Beers, bikes and binging: for teens, it’s easy access

Beers, bikes and binging: for teens, it’s easy access

With no current legal drinking age, teenagers are free to drink as much beer as they want in Cambodia. Hong Menea



Seventeen-year-old Doung Sokchea has been drinking since midday. Now it’s after sunset, and he’s one of many teenagers gathered on an embankment overlooking the Mekong on Koh Pich. Most are on motorbikes, many have beers in hand.

In Phnom Penh, where it seems that beer is available on every corner – from bars to streetside vending machines – alcohol consumption isn’t restricted by age or social status. Sokchea says that he started drinking when he left school three years ago, and he’s not alone.

“People my age drink a lot of alcohol compared to young people before,” he says. “For my generation, it’s easier than for my parents’ generation. The culture isn’t strict like it was for them.”

For Sokchea, consuming beer and palm wine is now a daily ritual – and one to which he hasn’t given too much thought. “I just know that if I drink a lot of beer or wine, I will get sick, but I don’t know exactly about the consequences,” he says.

That’s likely because for teenagers drinking anything from beer to hard liquor in Phnom Penh, there aren’t any legal consequences. There is no drinking age in Cambodia, and a draft law on alcohol consumption is tied up in red tape.

It’s not just Cambodian teens taking part. For the children of expatriates, many of whom can’t legally drink before 18 in their home countries, easy access to alcohol is, as one teenage student puts it, “just part of the normal”.

The habits – and the lack of knowledge about them – raise concern at the Ministry of Education. Dr Young Kunthearith, deputy director of the department of school health, says there are plans to integrate alcohol awareness studies into the national curriculum by 2018.

“A lot of young people are drinking, from 13 or 14 years old,” Kunthearith says. He believes alcohol advertising has led to a rise in youth consumption. But beyond the school environment, it’s not something over which the ministry has any control.

Cans of beer are available in some Phnom Penh vending machines. Eli Lillis

Broader regulation is ostensibly in the works: the Law on Alcohol Products Control was submitted by the Ministry of Health to the Council of Ministers for approval in July 2015. But the ministry was unable to offer comment on its status, and government spokesperson Phay Siphan could not confirm the submission.

The draft law – which suggests the drinking age be set at 21 years old – was endorsed at a ministerial meeting over a year ago, says Dr Yel Daravuth, technical officer for the World Health Organization (WHO) in Cambodia. He says it’s been delayed by the power of the alcohol industry.

“The alcohol industry has a lot of strong lobbying with high-level policy-makers, which is why we believe the law is being delayed, despite public support,” he says.

Daravuth adds that without a law to regulate or inform people about the health impacts of alcohol, it is costing Cambodian society. “I don’t believe people understand how much alcohol has an effect on health,” he says. “[The accessibility] has made the drinking culture very aggressive. If they’re happy, they drink. If they’re sad, they drink.”

Katie*, 17, who attends an international school in the capital, doesn’t think a law would have much impact. “It might in the beginning make some little change, but it’s so easy to just say, ‘I forgot my ID’ or ‘I’m travelling,’” she says. “You find ways around it. It depends on the bars and the cops – if they’re prepared to bust up every single place.”

She says that most of her classmates started drinking when they were around 14 years old. While things occasionally get out of hand, she says most kids opt for a beer or two rather than bingeing – a contrast, perhaps, with the heavy drinking culture of many expatriates.

But Laurent Pons, the British general manager of backpacker den Top Banana, says the bar has recently had to install its own age restriction, set at 18. He has seen an uptick in the number of teenagers trying to get in over the last couple of years, and their “messy” behaviour has increased ID checks.

“You can find alcohol so easily in Cambodia, but I don’t want to be responsible if something happens,” he says. “It’s the same thing as back [in England]: it just makes sense not to serve minors.” But he adds that enforcing a legal drinking age of 21, as it is in the US, would be “business suicide”.

Young people often combine booze and bikes on Koh Pich. Hong Menea

Leanna Payne has spent much of her 22 years in Phnom Penh. She, like Katie, graduated from an international school, and says that during her teenage years a routine of casual drinks – not bingeing – was a regular pastime.

But Payne says that as the venues have changed, so has the culture. She and her friends used to go to the dive bars on riverside, but now students are more likely to be seen dressed up with a private table at a club like Nova.

“You see people trying to emulate certain things now – like pop stars – and [whether casual drinking is safe or not] depends on your reason for drinking,” she says.

Katie and Payne say that it’s their upper-class Cambodian classmates who face social pressure to consume more, as a sign of wealth – but it’s done behind closed doors.

“When wealthy Cambodians go out, if they do get super drunk, they try to do it secretively and not in public,” Katie says. “If they make a scene, it reflects badly on their families, and if their families are connected to the government, it makes a big scandal,” she says.

Daravuth, of the WHO, is concerned that it’s the beginning of a culture of bingeing.

“I believe if the youth are having one or two drinks, they will probably be having more,” he says. “It affects their jobs, their future, their economic position: it is a loss of human resources. It leads to violence, crimes, fights, and drunk driving accidents.”

“The youth are the future, but if they are drinking alcohol regularly, it’s bad for the new generation.”

Detpoun Bun, who manages nightclub Zeus – popular among locals – agrees that while restrictions could benefit the community, he’s unsure whether any law would ever limit youth consumption.

“It would save a lot of accidents and all that crazy stuff,” he says. “But it’s Cambodia – who’s going to enforce it?”

Cambodia: 25 Years of Peace, But to What End?

Cambodia: 25 Years of Peace, But to What End?

A quarter-century after the 1991 Paris Peace Accords, questions remain about the country’s future.

The Diplomat, by Mong Palatino, November 4, 2016
Twenty-five years have passed since the signing of the Paris Peace Agreement, which ended the war in Cambodia and paved the way for the restoration of democratic institutions in the country. How has Cambodia fared so far?

Various groups, including some of the 18 parties that signed the agreement, commemorated the anniversary last October to highlight the most pressing political issues that continue to beleaguer the country.

There is consensus about the relevance of the agreement and its historic role in establishing the country’s constitution and the subsequent holding of elections in 1993. But critics bewail the failure of the Hun Sen government, which has been in power for three decades already, to implement the
There is consensus about the relevance of the agreement and its historic role in establishing the country’s constitution and the subsequent holding of elections in 1993. But critics bewail the failure of the Hun Sen government, which has been in power for three decades already, to implement the substantial provisions of the agreement, which would have strengthened democratic rule in the country.

They cited the recent passage of draconian laws that undermine trade unions and NGOs, the killing of government critics, the prosecution of opposition leaders, the unjust detention of activists, and the ban on street protests as disturbing signs of the government’s rejection of its commitment to fulfill the goals of the 1991 Paris agreement.

After visiting the country for 10 days, United Nations special rapporteur Rhona Smith lamented the deliberate violation of some constitutional processes.

“There are many examples of the law being applied in an apparently discriminatory or politicized manner. Restrictions on freedoms of assembly, expression and association are particularly problematic,” she said.

Earlier in September, 39 countries signed a statement addressed to the UN Human Rights Council about the deterioration of democracy in Cambodia.

“We are deeply concerned about the current escalation of political tensions in Cambodia, which threatens legitimate activities by opposition parties and human rights NGOs. There is particular concern about the appearance that legal action is being disproportionately pursued against critics of the government,” said the statement, which was read by United States Ambassador Keith Harper.

Chak Sopheap of the Cambodian Center for Human Rights reminded the government that the Paris Peace Agreement gave top priority to human rights protection.

“Human rights were not merely seen as a response to Cambodia’s past, but also as the best guarantee for a stable, prosperous, and peaceful future. The drafters of the Paris Peace Agreements saw respect for human rights as an essential condition for the creation of a ‘positive peace,’ which would allow real democracy to flourish,” she wrote in an article published by the Phnom Penh Post.

The government acknowledged the legacy of the 1991 Paris agreement, although Prime Minister Hun Sen was quick to add that it was his so-called “win-win” policy of granting amnesty, jobs, and land that effectively convinced the remaining Khmer Rouge elements to surrender in the 1990s.

Keo Remy, head of the government’s Human Rights Committee, asserted that the country’s situation has vastly improved since the signing of the 1991 Paris agreement.

“When you do more research you will know that the human rights situation in Cambodia is better. What’s most important is peace, because if there’s no peace then there’s zero human rights,” he said in a media interview.

In the end, Cambodians will decide whether the government has faithfully implemented the political objectives listed in the 1991 Paris Peace Agreement. Meanwhile, the countries that took part in the signing are also duty-bound to help in monitoring Cambodia’s progress in building a state where rule of law, plural democracy, and civil liberties are respected.

Thursday, November 3, 2016

ពលរដ្ឋ​សហគមន៍​ភ្នំបាត​ដាក់​ញត្តិ​នៅ​ក្រសួង​សេដ្ឋកិច្ច​ឲ្យ​ជួយ​ដោះស្រាយ​បញ្ហា​ទីលំនៅ

អតីត​អ្នក​បុរីកីឡា​ដែល​ត្រូវ​បាន​បណ្ដេញ​ឲ្យ​ទៅ​រស់នៅ​សហគមន៍​ភ្នំបាត ប្រមាណ ៥៧​នាក់ តំណាង​ឲ្យ​ប្រជាពលរដ្ឋ ១៤០​គ្រួសារ​នៅ​ភូមិ​ស្រះពោធិ ឃុំ​ផ្សារដែក ខេត្ត​កណ្ដាល នៅ​ព្រឹក​ថ្ងៃ​ទី​៣ ខែ​វិច្ឆិកា នេះ នាំ​គ្នា​ទៅ​កាន់​ក្រសួង​សេដ្ឋកិច្ច និង​ហិរញ្ញវត្ថុ ដើម្បី​ដាក់​ញត្តិ​ជូន​រដ្ឋមន្ត្រី​ឲ្យ​ជួយ​ដោះស្រាយ​បញ្ហា​ដែល​ពួក​គាត់​ជួប​ប្រទះ។

តំណាង​ពលរដ្ឋ​មក​ពី​សហគមន៍​ភ្នំបាត មួយ​រូប គឺ​លោកស្រី គឹម សារ៉ាន់។ លោកស្រី​មាន​ប្រសាសន៍​ថា ពួក​គាត់​បាន​ដាក់​ញត្តិ​ទៅ​កាន់​ស្ថាប័ន​ពាក់ព័ន្ធ​មួយ​ចំនួន ដើម្បី​សុំ​អន្តរាគមន៍ ប៉ុន្តែ​មិន​មាន​លទ្ធផល​នោះ​ឡើយ។ ដូច្នេះ លោកស្រី​បាន​សម្រេច​ទៅ​កាន់​ក្រសួង​សេដ្ឋកិច្ច ក្រែង​មាន​សង្ឃឹម​ខ្លះ។ លោកស្រី​ឲ្យ​ដឹង​បន្ត​ថា សព្វថ្ងៃ​នេះ សហគមន៍​ភ្នំបាត ជួប​បញ្ហា​ក្នុង​ការ​រស់នៅ​យ៉ាង​ធ្ងន់ធ្ងរ៖ «បច្ចុប្បន្ន​នេះ​ជួប​បញ្ហា​ភាព​អន់​ឃ្លាន គ្មាន​លុយ​កាក់ បាត់បង់​មុខ​របរ កូន​អត់​បាន​ទៅ​សាលា ខ្វះ​មន្ទីរពេទ្យ សាលា​រៀន ខ្វះ​ភ្លើង​ប្រើប្រាស់ ទឹក​អណ្ដូង​ពណ៌​ឡើង​ក្រហម។ អ្នក​ភូមិ​មាន​ជំងឺ​ស្លាប់​អស់ ១២​នាក់។ ដូច្នេះ​សូម​ឲ្យ​ម្ចាស់​ជំនួយ​ទាំង​ជាតិ និង​អន្តរជាតិ ជួយ​ដាក់​សម្ពាធ​ដល់​រដ្ឋាភិបាល​ឲ្យ​ជួយ​ដោះស្រាយ​ជូន​សកម្មជន​ដីធ្លី​ទាំងអស់»។


តំណាង​ពលរដ្ឋ​បី​រូប ត្រូវ​បាន​ក្រសួង​អនុញ្ញាត​ឲ្យ​ចូល​ដាក់​ញត្តិ។ ក្រោយ​ពេល​ចូល​ដាក់​ញត្តិ​រួច ពលរដ្ឋ​ឲ្យ​ដឹង​ថា តំណាង​ក្រសួង​មួយ​រូប​បាន​ទទួល​យក​ញត្តិ ដោយ​មាន​លេខ​ទូរស័ព្ទ​ពួក​គាត់​សម្រាប់​ទំនាក់ទំនង​ផង ព្រម​ទាំង​សន្យា​ថា នឹង​ផ្ដល់​ដំណឹង​ទៅ​ដល់​ថ្នាក់​លើ។

ញត្តិ​ដែល​សហគមន៍​ភ្នំបាត បាន​ដាក់​ទៅ​កាន់​ក្រសួង​នោះ​មាន ២​ចំណុច៖

១-ស្នើ​ផ្ដល់​ទីលំនៅ​ឲ្យ​ពួក​គាត់​បាន​មក​រស់នៅ​ភូមិ​អណ្ដូង ដូច​ករណី​អ្នក​តវ៉ា​នៅ​បុរីកីឡា​ដែល​ទើប​ទទួល​បាន​សំណង​ថ្មីៗ​នេះ ក្នុង​នោះ​ផ្ទះ ១​បន្ទប់ និង​ប្រាក់ ៥​ពាន់​ដុល្លារ។

២-ស្នើ​សំណង​បន្ថែម​ចំនួន ១​ម៉ឺន​ដុល្លារ​លើ​ការ​រស់នៅ​ភ្នំបាត (ករណី​មិន​មាន​ដំណោះស្រាយ​នៅ​ភូមិ​អណ្ដូង)។

ពលរដ្ឋ​អះអាង​ថា ពួក​គាត់​នឹង​ត្រឡប់​ទៅ​តវ៉ា​នៅ​ក្រសួង​នេះ​សាជាថ្មី បើ​សិន​ពួក​គាត់​មិន​ទទួល​បាន​ដំណោះស្រាយ៕អតីត​អ្នក​បុរីកីឡា​ដែល​ត្រូវ​បាន​បណ្ដេញ​ឲ្យ​ទៅ​រស់នៅ​សហគមន៍​ភ្នំបាត ដាក់​ញត្តិ​នៅ​ក្រសួង​សេដ្ឋកិច្ច និង​ហិរញ្ញវត្ថុ នៅ​ព្រឹក​ថ្ងៃ​ទី​៣ ខែ​វិច្ឆិកា ឆ្នាំ​២០១៦។ RFA/Phan Yasy

ក្រសួង​កសិកម្ម​ជំរុញ​ឲ្យ​អ្នក​រក​ស៊ី​អនុវត្ត​កសិកម្ម​កិច្ចសន្យា​ដើម្បី​ធានា​ទំនុក​ចិត្ត​កសិករ

កិច្ច​សន្ទនា​ពហុភាគី​ស្ដីពី​ធុរកិច្ច និង​សិទ្ធិ​មនុស្ស​នៅ​ថ្ងៃ​ទី​៣ ខែ​វិច្ឆិកា នេះ ក្រសួង​កសិកម្ម បាន​ជំរុញ​ឲ្យ​អ្នក​ធុរកិច្ច ឬ​អ្នក​រក​ស៊ី​វិស័យ​ឯកជន និង​បណ្ដា​ក្រុមហ៊ុន​នាំ​ចេញ​ទាំង​ក្នុង និង​ក្រៅ​ប្រទេស គួរ​ងាក​មក​ប្រតិបត្តិ​កសិកម្ម​កិច្ចសន្យា ដើម្បី​ធានា​ទំនុក​ចិត្ត​ដល់​កសិករ និង​សិទ្ធិ​មនុស្ស​ក្នុង​វិស័យ​កសិកម្ម​កម្ពុជា។ ចំណែក​អ្នក​ធុរកិច្ច និង​ក្រុមហ៊ុន​នាំ​ចេញ​ពាក់ព័ន្ធ​នឹង​វិស័យ​កសិកម្ម បង្ហាញ​ការ​គាំទ្រ ប៉ុន្តែ​ស្នើ​ឲ្យ​រដ្ឋាភិបាល ត្រូវ​ត្រៀម​កញ្ចប់​ថវិកា​វិនិយោគ​បន្ថែម​ដល់​សហគមន៍​កសិករ។

ក្រសួង​កសិកម្ម រុក្ខាប្រមាញ់ និង​នេសាទ អះអាង​ថា ប្រតិបត្តិ​កសិកម្ម ឬ​ផលិតកម្ម​តាម​កិច្ចសន្យា គឺ​ជា​វិធីសាស្ត្រ​តែ​មួយ​គត់​ដែល​ជួយ​កសាង​ទំនុក​ចិត្ត​ដល់​ការ​ធ្វើ​ធុរកិច្ច និង​សិទ្ធិ​មនុស្ស​ក្នុង​វិស័យ​កសិកម្ម​កម្ពុជា ពិសេស​ផ្តល់​អំណាច​ដល់​កសិករ​ក្នុង​ការ​ចរចា​តម្លៃ​លក់​ផលិតផល​របស់​ខ្លួន។

ប្រតិភូ​រាជ​រដ្ឋាភិបាល ទទួល​បន្ទុក​ជា​អគ្គនាយក​នៃ​អគ្គនាយកដ្ឋាន​កសិកម្ម នៃ​ក្រសួង​កសិកម្ម រុក្ខាប្រមាញ់ និង​នេសាទ លោក ហ៊ាន វណ្ណហន មាន​ប្រសាសន៍​ថា បច្ចុប្បន្ន​ការ​អនុវត្ត​ផលិតកម្ម​តាម​កិច្ចសន្យា​រវាង​សហគមន៍​កសិករ និង​ក្រុមហ៊ុន​នាំ​ចេញ ព្រម​ទាំង​វិស័យ​ឯកជន​នៅ​មាន​កម្រិត​នៅ​ឡើយ។ លោក​ថា ផលិតកម្ម​តាម​កិច្ចសន្យា​ជា​យុទ្ធសាស្ត្រ​របស់​រដ្ឋាភិបាល ធានា​ទំនុក​ចិត្ត​ដល់​កសិករ​ឲ្យ​ទទួល​បាន​បច្ចេកទេស និង​ទីផ្សារ៖ «»។


បន្ថែម​ពី​នេះ លោក ហ៊ាន វណ្ណហន បាន​ជំរុញ​ឲ្យ​អ្នក​ធុរកិច្ច​វិស័យ​ឯកជន និង​បណ្ដា​ក្រុមហ៊ុន​នាំ​ចេញ​ផ្នែក​កសិកម្ម​ទាំងអស់ គួរ​តែ​ប្រតិបត្តិ​កសិកម្ម​តាម​កិច្ចសន្យា​ប្រកប​ដោយ​ភាព​ស្មោះត្រង់ ដើម្បី​ធានា​ទាំង​សេដ្ឋកិច្ច បរិស្ថាន សង្គម និង​សិទ្ធិ​មនុស្ស​ដល់​សហគមន៍​កសិករ ពិសេស​បញ្ចៀស​បញ្ហា​ប្រឈម​ក្នុង​វិស័យ​កសិកម្ម។

ជា​អ្នក​ធុរកិច្ច និង​ជា​អគ្គនាយក​ក្រុមហ៊ុន​នាំ​ចេញ​អង្ករ អេមរុ រ៉ាយ (AMRU RICE) លោក សុង សារ៉ន គាំទ្រ​ចំពោះ​ការ​ជំរុញ​របស់​ក្រសួង​កសិកម្ម។ ប៉ុន្តែ​លោក​ថា ខណៈ​កម្ពុជា ជា​ប្រទេស​កំពុង​អភិវឌ្ឍ លោក​ស្នើ​ឲ្យ​បណ្ដា​ក្រុមហ៊ុន​នាំ​ចេញ​ដែល​អនុវត្ត​ផលិតកម្ម​កិច្ចសន្យា​ទាំងអស់ ត្រូវ​ធ្វើ​ការ​រួម​គ្នា​ផ្សព្វផ្សាយ និង​ធានា​ទីផ្សារ​ជូន​សហគមន៍​កសិករ​ដែល​កំពុង​អនុវត្ត​ផលិតកម្ម​កិច្ចសន្យា។

ទន្ទឹម​គ្នា​នេះ លោក​យល់​ថា ដើម្បី​ឲ្យ​ការ​អនុវត្ត​ផលិតកម្ម​កិច្ចសន្យា​នៅ​កម្ពុជា ទទួល​ជោគជ័យ លោក​ស្នើ​ឲ្យ​រដ្ឋាភិបាល​ត្រូវ​ត្រៀម​កញ្ចប់​ថវិកា​វិនិយោគ​បន្ថែម​ដល់​សហគមន៍​កសិករ៖ «»។

កិច្ច​សន្ទនា​ពហុភាគី​ស្ដីពី​ធុរកិច្ច និង​សិទ្ធិ​មនុស្ស ក្រសួង​កសិកម្ម ឲ្យ​ដឹង​ថា បច្ចុប្បន្ន កម្ពុជា មាន​សហគមន៍​កសិកម្ម​ជាង ៨០០​សហគមន៍ ហើយ​ភាគច្រើន​សហគមន៍​កសិកម្ម​ទាំងនោះ​នៅ​មាន​ភាព​កម្សោយ មិន​ទាន់​យល់​ច្បាប់ និង​គណនេយ្យ​ភាព។ ក្រសួង​កសិកម្ម រំពឹង​ថា តាម​រយៈ​ប្រតិបត្តិ​កសិកម្ម ឬ​ផលិតកម្ម​តាម​កិច្ចសន្យា នឹង​ជំរុញ​ឲ្យ​កសិកម្ម​កម្ពុជា ឲ្យ​ល្អ​ប្រសើរ​ឡើង៕ប្រតិភូ​រាជ​រដ្ឋាភិបាល​ទទួល​បន្ទុក​ជា​អគ្គនាយក​នៃ​អគ្គនាយកដ្ឋាន​កសិកម្ម នៃ​ក្រសួង​កសិកម្ម រុក្ខាប្រមាញ់ និង​នេសាទ លោក ហ៊ាន វណ្ណហន ផ្តល់​បទសម្ភាសន៍​នៅ​ថ្ងៃ​ទី​៣ ខែ​វិច្ឆិកា ឆ្នាំ​២០១៦។ RFA/Um Rainsey

Police accused of dispersing locals

Police accused of dispersing locals

Commune police congregate a Tbong Khmom pagoda on Tuesday where they allegedly broke up a gathering. Supplied.

Locals yesterday accused commune police of breaking up a gathering of 12 villagers at Memot pagoda in Tbong Khmum’s Memot commune on Tuesday, though authorities maintained they had merely questioned the group to “maintain security and stability”.

According to one of the villagers in the group, Phon Sophal, the group was waiting for a few other members at the pagoda – where they had arranged to meet before leaving for another location to discuss plans for a Human Rights Day celebration next month – when they were approached by the police.

“[The police said that] when people gather it surprises others, and a lot of people will come . . . create a mess . . . affecting public order,” he said.

“They said we should ask for permission. I said a simple gathering doesn’t require us to inform them, as this is our right and it is not an important issue.”

Nonetheless, he said, police then asked the group to leave.

However, Memot commune deputy police chief Yan Sitha denied police had demanded the group disperse.

“It is not true that we did not allow them to gather there. The police just asked them about their aim, because people get afraid when they see a gathering,” he said. “It is to maintain security. What’s wrong with just notifying us?”